Closed juliangruber closed 11 years ago
You should create a mux-demux immediately before you pipe it, or explicitly pause it.
This will work:
var server = multilevel.server('/db').pause()
net.createServer(function (c) {
c.pipe(server.resume()).pipe(c)
})
Just tried it in https://github.com/juliangruber/multilevel/blob/master/test/util.js
This doesn't work:
var server = multilevel.server(__dirname + '/db').pause()
net.createServer(function (con) {
con.pipe(server.resume()).pipe(con)
}).listen(port)
oh, oops
just realized, resume()
resumes immediately, so you need to
var server = multilevel.server(__dirname + '/db').pause()
net.createServer(function (con) {
con.pipe(server).pipe(con)
server.resume()
}).listen(port)
sorry.
returning it prepaused is unusual. If really want to do that make sure you document it CLEARLY.
Generally, you shouldn't need to create a stream before you pipe it, so this is best:
net.createServer(function (con) {
con.pipe(multilevel.server(__dirname + '/db')).pipe(con)
}).listen(port)
actually, this is wrong:
var server = multilevel.server(__dirname + '/db').pause()
net.createServer(function (con) {
con.pipe(server).pipe(con)
server.resume()
}).listen(port)
because when multiple connections join, they will all be piped onto the same stream.
instead, you want a stream from multilevel
for each connection.
Also, can you alias multilevel.server
and multilevel.client
to multilevel.createServerStream
and multilevel.createClientStream
as it will make their behaviour more obvious?
ok. @substack I think that "you shouldn't need to create a stream before you pipe it" pattern should go in the stream handbook?
Me and @ralphtheninja had this problem that MuxDemux wrote its meta infos before mux-demux was piped anywhere, like:
If you inspect the traffic you see that the server-mdm wrote its meta before the connection to the client was up. What I saw you doing to avoid this is you create the mdm object inside the net.createServer-handler.
That works for this case, but libraries using mux-demux (like multilevel) have the problem that they can't expose a simple stream interface anymore.
multilevel
directly exports its underlying MuxDemux-instance. What I could do is wrap that in a paused duplex-stream and listen formdm.on('pipe', fn)
but I think that this should happen insidemux-demux
, in order not to leak its implementation details.If you want I can hack up a PR that for every
pipe
event emits its stream meta.