Closed rkusa closed 10 years ago
Well I think the heart of the protocol is really about log replication. it's the handshake that is the important thing. When they talk about 'old values' that is in a layer on top of that.
The way the use it,
they forget information that isn't relavant - which is how scuttlebutt/model
works,
but scuttlebutt/events
doesn't forget anything.
Ok, if I get it right, you do a full-history sync instead of just syncing the most recent values, which makes scuttlebutt/events work.
Thanks for the info
If I am reading the paper (Efficient Reconciliation and Flow Control for Anti-Entropy Protocols) right, the history of a certain key is not guaranteed to sync completely, i.e., in some edge-cases some old values/versions are omitted.
E.g. Paper p. 3 figure 1 and
Have you made some adjustments to the scuttlebutt approach to guarantee full-history sync, does the scuttlebutt/events omit events, or do I get the paper wrong?
Just want to now, what to expect from scuttlebutt/events :wink:
Thanks