Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
This is expected, "nano" is minimalist, consequently does not satisfy
dependencies for "login support" or any
user disctinction nor management tool as `passwd'.
Also `passwd' depends on OpenDirectory.framework which is not provided in
"nano".
Original comment by Aladin.Q...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2010 at 12:09
Should we remove the "system_cmds" project (the one which contains`passwd')
from "nano"?
Original comment by Aladin.Q...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2010 at 10:44
Ah, I see. Yes, if it can't work on nano then we should maybe replace it with a
fake "passwd" that echos "This
command is not supported in this minimal edition of the operating system, this
is not a bug" ;-)
Original comment by appeng...@puredarwin.org
on 3 Jan 2010 at 12:21
I'm more partisan of removing `passwd' (and binaries which behaves similarly).
Removing the "system_cmds" project implies that e.g., sysctl, dmesg,
dynamic_pager, etc.. which belong to the
"system_cmds" projects will not be available and could lead to frustration.
Original comment by Aladin.Q...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2010 at 11:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
appeng...@puredarwin.org
on 2 Jan 2010 at 5:07