Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
This change properly disables and enables the applicable tab view buttons at
the top of the window:
https://code.google.com/p/munki/source/detail?r=f0a6ba410565b2848b6fce44f176bdd9
9323fd7c&name=Munki2
Original comment by gregnea...@mac.com
on 13 Aug 2014 at 5:49
This caused one regression. managedsoftwareupdate will no longer attempt to
download client_resources, causing any admin footer changes to not be displayed.
Original comment by eriknico...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 1:05
Are you sure this is a regression? When AppleSoftwareUpdatesOnly is true, the
client never talks to a Munki repo and therefore never has the opportunity to
get custom resources. I can't see how it _ever_ got custom resources when
AppleSoftwareUpdatesOnly is true.
Since it's expected behavior that the client never talks to a Munki repo when
AppleSoftwareUpdatesOnly is true, I'm not convinced there is a bug to address.
Original comment by gregnea...@mac.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 1:14
I guess you are correct with regards to functionality. The test client did have
a client resources zip already present and it did not change to grab an updated
zip.
Original comment by eriknico...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 1:58
Which suggests the method admins could use to customize MSC.app without needing
a Munki repo.
Original comment by gregnea...@mac.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 2:08
Did you forget to paste something? I don't understand the context of your last
update.
Original comment by eriknico...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 2:16
No, I didn't forget to paste anything. You noted that MSC.app would use an
existing client_resources/custom.zip, so if one wasn't using a Munki server;
was using MSC.app for AppleSoftwareUpdatesOnly; and wanted a custom footer,
they could install a file at /Library/Managed
Installs/client_resources/custom.zip to accomplish that.
Original comment by gregnea...@mac.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 3:45
Okay, yes. I understand now.
This is a feature, not a regression. Thanks for fixing the initial request.
Original comment by eriknico...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2014 at 1:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
eriknico...@gmail.com
on 13 Aug 2014 at 2:50