Dear author, thank you for your contribution. I have a question: the size of the four stages of the deformer has been reduced by half in sequence. In contrast, the stages 2-4 of this model are all H/8 * W/8 in size. What are the considerations for this design?
Dear author, thank you for your contribution. I have a question: the size of the four stages of the deformer has been reduced by half in sequence. In contrast, the stages 2-4 of this model are all H/8 * W/8 in size. What are the considerations for this design?