Closed weeknan closed 1 year ago
Hi. I think the cifar100 dataset in vtab1k benchmark only uses 1000 training samples, while Table 1 shows results on full cifar100 dataset with 50000 training images. There are some details in Table 8.
i see, thank you!
In the paper, Table 1 shows SSF gets 93.99% top-1 Acc using ViT-B/16 on CIFAR100. However, in Table 4, SSF gets 69.0% top-1 Acc using ViT-B/16 on CIFAR100. Are there any different settings between these two results? It seems like using the same model.