Scores:
Code 4 - You got all the code right, and did a particularly good job formatting code for readability in a bunch of spots.
Presentation 4 - Slides have a nice layout and are easy to understand.
Hypothesis 2 - Could have more clearly stated null hypothesis and what the chi square tests were trying to determine, but otherwise have a question for each test about what is being asked.
Interpretations 3 - Need to revise the p-value typo, but otherwise got the correct interpretations from each test and advise the company about how to improve.
Overall 13/16 - Meets expectations, Did a pretty good job but could use a bit of clarification and cleaning up a typo. The code portion is fantastic however. Congratulations completing the Intensive!
doriel
commented
5 years ago
Scores: Code 4 - You got all the code right, and did a particularly good job formatting code for readability in a bunch of spots. Presentation 4 - Slides have a nice layout and are easy to understand. Hypothesis 2 - Could have more clearly stated null hypothesis and what the chi square tests were trying to determine, but otherwise have a question for each test about what is being asked. Interpretations 3 - Need to revise the p-value typo, but otherwise got the correct interpretations from each test and advise the company about how to improve.
Overall 13/16 - Meets expectations, Did a pretty good job but could use a bit of clarification and cleaning up a typo. The code portion is fantastic however. Congratulations completing the Intensive!