Closed shiranr closed 3 months ago
@shiranr I'm not sure I agree with this PR. This wrapper is the Fhir client wrapper for the Data Hub? By calling it FhirClientWrapper
it causes confusion with the other client wrapper we have PdsFhirClientWrapper
.
The name is an important distinction - so we know if we're talking to Pds Fhir, our own Data Hub Fhir.
I propose we leave as-in, with PdsFhirClientWrapper
and DataHubFhirClientWrapper
Closed the PR.
Renaming the class to inflect what it is actually doing. It is not related to the DataHub and it's goal is to wrap the fhir client so we can mock it in tests
Please add a description of what this PR is changing.