[fixes #161] After comparison with DR-DOS 7.01 and MS-DOS 6.22 it can
be seen that rmdir of a directory having the _A_RDONLY bit set should
succeed. This patch makes that change.
After applying the test result is now.
$ python test/test_dos.py test_fat_sfn_perms_check_rmdir
Test DR-DOS-7.01 FAT SFN Permission check on rmdir ... ok ( 2.44s)
Test FR-DOS-1.20 FAT SFN Permission check on rmdir ... FAIL
Test MS-DOS-6.22 FAT SFN Permission check on rmdir ... ok ( 2.25s)
Test PP-DOS-GIT FAT SFN Permission check on rmdir ... ok ( 1.92s)
======================================================================
FAIL: Test FR-DOS-1.20 FAT SFN Permission check on rmdir
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test/test_dos.py", line 4863, in test_fat_sfn_perms_check_rmdir
perms_check_rmdir(self, "FAT", "SFN")
File "/clients/common/dosemu2.git/test/func_perms_check_rmdir.py", line 81, in perms_check_rmdir
self.assertNotIn("FAIL:", results)
AssertionError: 'FAIL:' unexpectedly found in "testit.bat\r\nC:\\>d:\r\nD:\\>set LFN=n\r\nD:\\>c:\\defattr\r\nINFO: Mkdir = 'DIR_RO', err=0\r\nINFO: Getfattr attr=0x11\r\nFAIL: Rmdir failed, err=-1\r\nD:\\>"
Further info in file 'test_dos.FRDOS120TestCase.test_fat_sfn_perms_check_rmdir.log'
Further info in file 'test_dos.FRDOS120TestCase.test_fat_sfn_perms_check_rmdir.xpt'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 4 tests in 8.253s
FAILED (failures=1)
stsp
commented
3 years ago
[fixes #161] After comparison with DR-DOS 7.01 and MS-DOS 6.22 it can be seen that rmdir of a directory having the _A_RDONLY bit set should succeed. This patch makes that change.
After applying the test result is now.