Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Thanks for the patch.
How does your basic mode compare to the VB mode :
http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/source/browse/trunk/src/lang-vb.js
?
Original comment by mikesamuel@gmail.com
on 18 Jan 2011 at 4:45
VB Basic is much more advanced. Main differences are
* Basic Comment = REM vs. VB Comment = '
* Basic has other keywords: DATA, DEF FN, GOTO, etc. are not in VB
* plain/identifiers are only 1 or 2 letters with trailing % or $. I'm not sure if identifiers in VB allow % at the end.
* Literals are only numbers and 0.0E+0 notation
* Other stuff is only more restrictive, like whitespace, but the VB stuff should work, too
It's really very "retro", early 80ties. The reserved words are CBM Basic v2
(Commodore 64 BASIC). I'm not sure if it's reasonable to add it to the trunk,
but wanted to share it anyway.
Original comment by peter.codecop.kofler
on 20 Jan 2011 at 7:03
Original comment by mikesamuel@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2011 at 5:52
Thanks for the patch. Do you mind if I slap an Apache 2 license header on the
lang-* files?
> Basic Comment = REM vs. VB Comment = '
VB allows REM according to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa711643(v=VS.71).aspx
CommentMarker ::= SingleQuoteCharacter | REM
Interestingly, SingleQuoteCharacter can be a smart quote -- you know, for those
who develop in MS Word.
> Basic has other keywords: DATA, DEF FN, GOTO, etc. are not in VB
I saw GOSUB in your testcase and had a C64 flashback.
> plain/identifiers are only 1 or 2 letters with trailing % or $. I'm not sure
if identifiers in VB allow % at the end.
According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s9cz43ek.aspx they allow
an optional run of type characters at the end : \[[%&@!#$]+\]
> Literals are only numbers and 0.0E+0 notation
> Other stuff is only more restrictive, like whitespace, but the VB stuff
should work, too
Original comment by mikesamuel@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2011 at 3:19
>Thanks for the patch.
Thank **you** for maintaining prettify
>Apache 2 license
I'm not surem what licence I put into the header if any. Usually I use New BSD
License. Sure, go ahead with the Apache licence. I agree.
>keywords
not sure about it but maybe it's more reasonable to add the few missing
reserved words to your VB, so the number of files does not explode. On the
other hand, a VB variable might be called gosub?
Original comment by peter.codecop.kofler
on 15 Apr 2011 at 7:27
Regarding the Pascal highlighting:
I would suggest adding a few more keywords to the Pascal mode to make it
compatible with what is nowadays considered Pascal code (most if not all of
today's Pascal development (and Pascal projects hosted on Google Code) are done
with today's Object Pascal like it is implemented in Delphi or FPC and not so
much in the ancient early 1980's Borland dialects (don't get me wrong, nothing
against TurboPascal, I have spent many years with many versions of it but these
days are over, nowadays many of us old TurboPascal veterans spend most of our
time with Free Pascal or Delphi).
Here is a list of keywords:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refse3.html#x11-100001.3
It should contain all the keywords from sections
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
I am not sure how the prettify parser is capable of parsing the modifiers (from
section 1.3.4) that have a special meaning only when they occur in certain
places, if it doesn't highlight all of them it is not so important.
At least such *essential* words like try, finally, except, class, strict,
private, protected, public, published, overload, override, reintroduce,
virtual, abstract, initialization, finalization and many more that are found in
almost every Pascal source file nowadays should be highlighted.
Original comment by prof7...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2011 at 6:04
I committed this in change 244 which will make it into the next release.
Would you like committer access in case you find yourself feeling retro again
or making adjustements to this?
Original comment by mikesamuel@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2013 at 10:29
Mike that is nice of you to ask. I see from the long list of open issues that
you could use some help. And who knows, some of my next blog posts might use
another unusual language. But honestly, I do not work with Javascript much and
really can not promise you any help here beside coming up with new languages
(if at all).
Original comment by peter.codecop.kofler
on 13 Feb 2013 at 5:21
Cool. You know where to drop any new languages.
Original comment by mikesamuel@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2013 at 7:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
peter.codecop.kofler
on 16 Jan 2011 at 9:10Attachments: