Closed Plecra closed 4 years ago
Merging #53 into master will decrease coverage by
2.43%
. The diff coverage is0.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.77% 84.33% -2.44%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 242 249 +7
==========================================
Hits 210 210
- Misses 32 39 +7
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
dotenv_codegen_implementation/src/lib.rs | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8c2ba38...31e48e8. Read the comment docs.
What would you like me to do about those regressions? I'm pretty sure I haven't removed any tests, and the only changes I made were in the macro implementation
I'll look into it, but its been long enough since code coverage was run, I wouldn't be surprised if its just something going wrong with the codecov tool
Ooh, I can actually understand the report now. It's identified the couple error cases that I introduced but didn't test. I don't think it's worth putting together a compile error test harness for those couple cases though...
@Plecra its also in codegen, which can't really be code coverage tested.
Continued in #58
An implementation for #9