Add SignalR to article comparing gRPC with HTTP APIs

dotnet / AspNetCore.Docs

Documentation for ASP.NET Core

https://docs.microsoft.com/aspnet/core

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

12.63k stars 25.29k forks source link

Add SignalR to article comparing gRPC with HTTP APIs #11733

Open quicoli opened 5 years ago

quicoli commented 5 years ago

I believe a comparison with SignalR should also be done.

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

ID: 8321e4f0-1d12-c4cd-76af-a7df9ca2e732
Version Independent ID: c9e71059-2e31-3de3-eb26-0946cfe0ec3d
Content: Comparing gRPC services with HTTP APIs
Content Source: aspnetcore/grpc/comparison.md
Product: aspnet-core
GitHub Login: @JamesNK
Microsoft Alias: jamesnk

Mike-E-angelo commented 5 years ago

Totally my first thought when reading this. How does this (gRPC) differ/compare to SignalR?

erikmf12 commented 5 years ago

I think the Alternative Framework Scenarios explains it pretty well. gRPC can't be used in browser senarios, as well as not being made for broadcasting messages.

tanveerbadar commented 4 years ago

Can I also bug about adding a comparison to WCF?

bradygaster commented 3 years ago

cc @Rick-Anderson - i think there's merit to an overall-encompassing messaging article in the ASP.NET docset, that would cover (and potentially provide guidance-per-scenario) for SignalR, gRPC, and so on. This feels like a broader-scoped goal than just for SignalR. Is this something your team would own or would that be something the PG would need to author and submit for review?

Rick-Anderson commented 1 year ago

From #19940 by @PingPongSet

Is it possible to provide comparison between SignalR and gRPC?

For example, why is SignalR not used in MicroServices in backend services?

What is the difference in client server communication in areas of browsers and mobile apps?

Document details