search

dotnet / AspNetCore.Docs

Documentation for ASP.NET Core
https://docs.microsoft.com/aspnet/core
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
12.6k stars 25.3k forks source link

[UUF Port]: Blazor data-binding: More detail on steps needed #32663

Closed wadepickett closed 4 months ago

wadepickett commented 5 months ago

Description

United User Feedback Port: Customer Feedback: "

  1. after first creating a Bind.razor, what is expected to happen? where should I put it? The page localhost:num/bind doesn't work
  2. after then creating BindTheory.razor, what is expected to happen? where should I put it? Now the page localhost:num/bind starts to work, why? but when I enter numbers and letters in the input fields, nothing happens, why? The fields aren't updated in localhost:num/bind-theory either.
  3. same issues for BindEvent.razor, why doesn't it work, what is missing?
  4. @inject ISearchService SearchService where does that code go, I cannot figure it out, and now I'm lost and cannot come further on. "

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/components/data-binding?view=aspnetcore-8.0

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/components/data-binding.md

Document ID

3f912dfc-5ba5-6c6c-ba93-1ae78508a5cc

Article author

@guardrex

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

🕺💃 Happy Cinco de Mayo! 🥳🎈

A green dinosaur 🦖 will be along shortly to assist. Stand-by ........

guardrex commented 5 months ago

Thanks, @wadepickett ... I was wondering if/when this would happen. With a Blazor Web App that only renders statically on the server THAT ☝️ is the behavior for all components. Yes, I can address this, but it has to be done in some kind of global way because it applies to everything in Blazor for static SSR BWAs. We've tried to address it only via the Render Modes article, but this comment is in the vein of someone not realizing what will happen with all of our examples if they create their BWA without interactivity. If components aren't interactive ... well ... they aren't interactive! 😆

guardrex commented 5 months ago

BTW ... We don't have a way to reach this dev?

wadepickett commented 5 months ago

BTW ... We don't have a way to reach this dev?

If you mean do we have a way to reach the customer/community member who provided the feedback, we don't unfortunately. These UUF (Unified User Feedback) issues are all anonymous, unlike the doc issues created right in the repo by the "Open a documentation issue" feature available at the bottom of each doc page.

If you see "UUF" ported issues like this, it is anonymous, there is no more information available than the quote of the feedback inserted in the issue. You may decide after reviewing, knowing your content, that it is a lower priority than other work, or that it is a non-issue and should be closed, etc. Handle it accordingly, how you feel it should be handled. I am trying to weed out any UUF issues that are non-issues, or are already fixed before, or there is obviously not enough information to work with before I port them here, but the owner of the docs are going to know best how to handle it from there.

guardrex commented 5 months ago

Thanks ... I thought that was the case. it's too bad that I can't assist this dev directly.

This is a good issue. I know why the dev had this experience. Dan and I have tried to head this off with the content thus far, but I'll analyze the problem further in two weeks and see what else can be done.