Open ProKn1fe opened 1 year ago
No current plans for those devices, but contributions are always welcomed -- the Mac/ARM64 is being contributed by folks outside the Microsoft team.
So basically what need to make buildable on arm to run?
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/13130
As long as the PyTorch community is considering Arm64 an open issue, it will not be VERY VERY trivial for TorchSharp
Seems they already support arm targets as nvidia jetson https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch#nvidia-jetson-platforms
https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/
This is where official ARM64 support is needed before TorchSharp (I assume) will remotely consider ARM64
So basically what need to make buildable on arm to run?
- LibTorchSharp
- ???
ARM64 on Windows or Linux?
Theoretically, we should just need the ARM64 libtorch binaries, and then a setup to run tests in Azure Pipelines for release purposes. It should be possible to bundle the CPU support in the same NuGet as the other platforms, but I haven't thought through how it would impact the CUDA packages.
ARM64 on Windows or Linux?
Linux
@NiklasGustafsson Make more sense with Arm64 on Windows.
Builds on ARM64 are currently not working. Getting the following error: Visual Studio 2015, 2017 or 2019 required
Visual Studio is currently not available for ARM64. Visual Studio 2022 v17.4+ is supported on ARM64.
So maybe we should consider this possibility in the build scripts.
Well, there's no official distribution of libtorch for Windows / ARM64 (unless the team working on it has failed to let me know), so I wouldn't expect you to get much farther, anyway.
Any plans to support arm64 devices? Like Radxa Rock-5B or OrangePI 5. It in any cases throw this.