Open jonathanpeppers opened 15 hours ago
Right now our runtime packs are all identical for each .NET "runtime", but we want to be able to produce different packs, such as:
Microsoft.Android.Runtime.Mono.35.android-arm Microsoft.Android.Runtime.Mono.35.android-arm64 Microsoft.Android.Runtime.Mono.35.android-x86 Microsoft.Android.Runtime.Mono.35.android-x64 Microsoft.Android.Runtime.NativeAOT.35.android-arm Microsoft.Android.Runtime.NativeAOT.35.android-arm64 Microsoft.Android.Runtime.NativeAOT.35.android-x86 Microsoft.Android.Runtime.NativeAOT.35.android-x64
Currently, the contents of all these packs are identical, but this is an initial step to build multiple packs.
The plan is for the workload to only install the "Mono" packs, and the "NativeAOT" packs can be restored via NuGet.
I think the main question here is if we are ok with the new naming scheme:
Microsoft.Android.Runtime.Mono.35.[RID]
Microsoft.Android.Runtime.NativeAOT.35.[RID]
Right now our runtime packs are all identical for each .NET "runtime", but we want to be able to produce different packs, such as:
Currently, the contents of all these packs are identical, but this is an initial step to build multiple packs.
The plan is for the workload to only install the "Mono" packs, and the "NativeAOT" packs can be restored via NuGet.