Open afscrome opened 2 months ago
Gonna close this as a dupe of #2595 since we'd ideally address this as part of that work. Great call though - completely agree 💯
Another option is to just make custom resources look nicer with a lil change so we could do that in the meantime
@mitchdenny @davidfowl Where does this name come from? Is it the type name? If so, could a fix be a simple as removing "Resource" suffix from the type name?
We can do that, but it seemed a little aggressive to assume 😄:
What is the alternative? Add a ResourceTypeNameAnnotation?
Resources can already set it using WithInitialState
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe the problem.
Project
,Container
andExecutable
resoruces have nice concice names in theType
column of the Resources page (and in theResource Types
filter).Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice if
SqlServerDatabaseResource
(and possibly other resources) could have a similarly concise name. (e.g.SqlDatabase
orSqlServerDatabase
)Additional context
No response