Closed dougbu closed 5 months ago
@markwilkie we never placed #2018 into an epic or treated it as an Ops issue. How should we categorize this follow-on issue and anything we might want to do about the Microsoft.ImageFactory.SDK
package❔
I'm filing a Microsoft.ImageFactory.SDK
issue now&helliip;
Fixed with !39175 but needs a correction. See #2677 for that correction.
done
Work in #2018 did not cover all interactions with Image Factory. Base image creation (what we do in the dotnet-helix-machines-image-generation pipeline) uses a completely different approach to image creation.
CreateCustomImage
doesn't apply here.Many of the points from #2018 do apply (see below). However we'll need to manually update the base-images ARM templates and
ImageFactoryCli
to use the new pipeline.Reference material
We would like to adopt the Image Factory v3 API for two primary reasons:
Status: The server rejected the request because too many requests have been received for this subscription.
The v3 API may improve this situation.Main points of reference are
Microsoft.ImageFactory.Contracts
packageRelease Note Category
Release Note Description
Converted the rest of our interactions with the Image Factory service to use the v3 API.