When the needs-author-action label is in place and the author comments on the issue, we have a step of automation that replaces the needs-author-action label with the needs-further-triage label. As reported by @ManickaP, this does not take the untriaged label into account, and it can result in both untriaged and needs-further-triage being applied, which is unexpected (and noisy).
I believe the expected behavior would be:
If the needs-author-action label is applied and the author comments:
If the untriaged label is applied, simply remove the needs-author-action label
If the untriaged label is not applied, remove the needs-author-action label and add the needs-further-triage label
@ManickaP and @eiriktsarpalis -- do you both agree with those conditions?
When the
needs-author-action
label is in place and the author comments on the issue, we have a step of automation that replaces theneeds-author-action
label with theneeds-further-triage
label. As reported by @ManickaP, this does not take theuntriaged
label into account, and it can result in bothuntriaged
andneeds-further-triage
being applied, which is unexpected (and noisy).I believe the expected behavior would be:
If the
needs-author-action
label is applied and the author comments:untriaged
label is applied, simply remove theneeds-author-action
labeluntriaged
label is not applied, remove theneeds-author-action
label and add theneeds-further-triage
label@ManickaP and @eiriktsarpalis -- do you both agree with those conditions?