Open DedSec256 opened 2 years ago
no warnings 'comment is incomplete' for the 'l' parameter on the second screenshot
Perhaps this option is more preferable, since accessors cannot have separate documentation, and their parameter names can be repeated:
/// <summary></summary>
/// <param name="i"></param>
// is the i parameter from getter or setter?
member x.A with get i = 3
and set i k = ()
Inconsistent XmlDoc parameters analysis for properties with accessors
Repro steps
Project with enabled$(OtherFlags) --warnon:3390 option
The code above results in the following warnings
Remove the documentation for the parameter 'l'
Expected behavior
No warnings 'comment is invalid' for all accessor parameters on the first screenshot
or
no warnings 'comment is incomplete' for the 'l' parameter on the second screenshot