Open pavelsavara opened 11 months ago
Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Author: | pavelsavara |
---|---|
Assignees: | pavelsavara |
Labels: | `arch-wasm`, `area-System.Runtime.InteropServices.JavaScript`, `os-browser` |
Milestone: | 9.0.0 |
Lack of dotnet 8.0 support...
Lack of dotnet 8.0 support...
Not anymore https://github.com/Tewr/BlazorWorker/releases/tag/v4.0.0-preview2
@pavelsavara @lewing Where should the docs for this go? We put the JSImport/JSExport content in the Blazor docs. Do we want this content to be part of the Blazor docs as well? Are we getting to the point where we really should have a dedicated doc section on .NET runtime capabilities for WebAssembly?
Are we getting to the point where we really should have a dedicated doc section on .NET runtime capabilities for WebAssembly?
From my point of view a lot of things apply to both. In a lot of cases Blazor is really an UI library / application framework on top of runtime capabilities. Projecting such relation into docs seems good to me
For use-cases which don't need C# to interact with the UI, but they just need to calculate some logic in dotnet.
It already worked in Net7 with some fiddling, there is known use in the community since.
It works well in Net8. We should create demo how to start the single-threaded dotnet on separate WebWorker and how to
postMessage
json messages to it.For now it's
wasmbrowser
template and people have to figure out theWebWorker
part themself.