Open baronfel opened 2 months ago
Hi @baronfel I am new to Open-Source Can i work on this issue.
Awesome @kunalshokeen051 - I want to check with the rest of the team to make sure we want to do this, but once we chat about it and agree I'd love to accept a PR from you!
@kunalshokeen051 Ok, I've taken this to the team and we're all on board with the change. If you'd like to submit a PR we'd be happy to review and help get it merged.
Why not the other way around?
Instead of just adding a solution
alias to the sln
command, can we rename the sln
to solution
command and make the command sln
as a short-hand alias?
That'd be fine - there's no huge functional difference.
@baronfel Okay then, seems simple enough! If @kunalshokeen051 still wants to do it, please confirm, otherwise I can take it up.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We should add a
solution
alias to the existingsln
command. The current implementation of thesln
command interacts with.sln
files, but the new.slnx
file format logically supports many of the same commands. Some quick surveys suggest that most users want the currentsln
command to interact with.slnx
files, but thesln
name could present some confusion. Adding asolution
commanddotnet project
command