Add WinForms Analyzer and CodeFixes Infrastructure for C# and Visual Basic

[KlausLoeffelmann]

This PR introduces/extends the WinForms Analyzer infrastructure for C# and Visual Basic. We will be introducing for .NET 9 a first set of Analyzers and Code Fixes, specifically for WinForms applications. The Analyzers will help developers to identify common issues in their WinForms applications and the Code Fixes will help to automatically fix these issues.

The PR includes the following changes:

• Refactor existing Analyzers in preparation to add VB Projects both for Analyzers and Code Fixes.
• Introduce Analyzers/CodeFixes for missing CodeDOM serialization configuration both for C# and VB.
• Bump up Roslyn/Analyzer NuGet package versions.
• Fix formatting in resource files and inconsistencies in unshipped files.
• Setup remaining analyzer projects.

• Finalize analyzer configuration.

  Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.09677% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.84430%. Comparing base (c3cb9b3) to head (3cf1630). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #11515 +/- ## =================================================== + Coverage 74.78710% 74.84430% +0.05720% =================================================== Files 3021 3012 -9 Lines 629289 629269 -20 Branches 46689 46692 +3 =================================================== + Hits 470627 470972 +345 + Misses 155301 154936 -365 Partials 3361 3361 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Debug](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | `74.84430% <97.09677%> (+0.05720%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | `18.03813% <ø> (+0.07912%)` | :arrow_up: | | [production](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | `47.83718% <94.91525%> (+0.09464%)` | :arrow_up: | | [test](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | `97.02004% <100.00000%> (+0.03443%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/dotnet/winforms/pull/11515/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet) | `44.86531% <94.91525%> (+0.00807%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dotnet#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

[KlausLoeffelmann]

@RussKie: I would very much appreciate if you - in the future - respect my ask to NOT start reviewing a draft PR, especially when I point out that it is not ready for review. I appreciate your valuable engagement, but if I am in the process to completely restructure this, (but still want to see at the end of the day, if pipelines pass), premature reviews generate too much useless noise comments, half of which become redundant, anyway.

UPDATE: No longer Draft.