search

dotscad / trains

Toy train Things
29 stars 8 forks source link

Trackmaster parts and Customizer support #2

Open chambm opened 6 years ago

chambm commented 6 years ago

Did you do any work toward supporting Trackmaster (pre-2014 style) tracks? I've made good progress toward it; currently printing a straight one. Ultimately I'd like to make a new style of track that looks more like plain track rather than the gravel/track combination of the old-style Trackmaster tracks. Should save filament and time. :)

For Customizer support, can't we do some automatic preprocessing which includes all the dependencies into a single file and let Thingiverse work with that?

ex-nerd commented 6 years ago

I don't have access to any of the older track, and unfortunately the even newer Trackmaster track (including this year's change) requires support to print, and the connectors need to be thin and flexible to really work properly (which makes makes them

I do have plans to make some models with the new 2017/2018 wooden track connectors, though (even if they suck). I'm also pondering moving a lot of this work over to OnShape, because fillets are awesome and I can't see an easy way to do them coming to OpenScad any time soon.

chambm commented 6 years ago

Fillets are what you're using bevels for now?

You'll probably be getting a PR sometime to add support for the old TM track. :)

ex-nerd commented 6 years ago

A fillet is an edge treatment like a bevel, but rounded. Unfortunately, OpenSCAD doesn't track edges or even post-rendered vectors so it isn't possible to (easily) do things like arbitrary fillets or bevels.

broncosis commented 6 years ago

I am comfortable in onshape and fusion360 and have a thomas nut for a son I'd be game to help with some of this it would be good practice

chambm commented 6 years ago

@ex-nerd Do you know about the offset parameter (for 2d primitives), and minkowski() and hull() methods (for either 2d or 3d)? It seems pretty simple to create filleted or chamfered primitives this way.

I had finished the code for old TM track straight and curve sections, and even exported and printed it, but forgot to save the .scad file and lost a lot of the changes. :sob:

Instead of redoing that work, I've been thinking about porting the OS railway code to TM dimensions, and possibly adding the outside edges too. But are the outside edges really necessary? Can't the wheels just hug the rails and that'll keep it in the center? There would need to be a flat section between the railroad ties. I just prefer the look of plain railroad track rather than mixing it with the ballast and grading. So basically similar to the new Trackmaster track, but without the toothed surface and outer edge. I don't think printing it would need support if the straight sections between ties were arches or solid with infill.