I'm struggling to understand how the output of ConsensusTADs could be used as input to TADCompare. From what I understand, the All_Regions dataframe returned by ConsensusTADs could theoretically be substituted in place of point_dists# in TADCompare.R, but that's not built-in. I'm also not sure I understand whyTADCompare's pre_tads kwarg needs paired boundary coordinates. Is there any chance that TADCompare will eventually be able to use the outcome of ConsensusTADs to do group-vs-group comparisons? Or is there something I'm missing or misunderstanding?
Aaah wait sorry I think what I'm trying to do could be done outside of TADCompare by just applying the z-test to the two concensus tracks. Sorry for raising the issue, I think I've got it from here.
I'm struggling to understand how the output of
ConsensusTADs
could be used as input toTADCompare
. From what I understand, theAll_Regions
dataframe returned byConsensusTADs
could theoretically be substituted in place ofpoint_dists#
in TADCompare.R, but that's not built-in. I'm also not sure I understand whyTADCompare
'spre_tads
kwarg needs paired boundary coordinates. Is there any chance thatTADCompare
will eventually be able to use the outcome ofConsensusTADs
to do group-vs-group comparisons? Or is there something I'm missing or misunderstanding?