Unmatched size of timeStamps and simulation result in gridlabd

dpinney / omf

The Open Modeling Framework for smart grid cost-benefit analysis.

https://omf.coop

GNU General Public License v2.0

112 stars 60 forks source link

Unmatched size of timeStamps and simulation result in gridlabd #222

Closed cshjin closed 9 years ago

cshjin commented 10 years ago

Choose feeder: Simple Market System, set simulation length to 100, starting from April 1st. and run in gridlabd. The length of timeStamps is 100, while size of consumption power in result is 99. Gridlabd may skip one timestamp for some reasons

It maybe internal problem of gridlabd, contact them for more details.

cshjin commented 10 years ago

Commit 2817b1899025a8142f68149d80cfa5cd6bf43d3a temporarily fix the problem of monetization charts in multi-gridlabd model.

dpinney commented 10 years ago

Hmm. I ran some tests of FBS versus NR and couldn't reproduce the bug. We're dealing with something very weird.

cshjin commented 10 years ago

If you ran that test using gridlabd command, the issue may be related to our own code. check https://github.com/dpinney/omf/blob/master/omf/models/gridlabSingle.py#L162

dpinney commented 10 years ago

But our code is perfect! Okay, maybe not.

cshjin commented 10 years ago

One feeder ACEC Geo has the same problem.

dpinney commented 9 years ago

TODO

Try for an hour to reproduce.

QUESTIONS

Is this an issue? This is probably a daylight savings time.

dpinney commented 9 years ago

I couldn't reproduce it.