Closed LeonB closed 2 years ago
Yes, this is because the array on array is not supported, only the array on "furniture part" - at base element. The array wasn't made to call it at any object. Probably it can be fixed by call recursively scanObjects instead of furniture part. I will look into that someday if this can be improved.
Support for array on array has been added. I use caller feature instead of scanObjects because it was little tricky with the base hidden object.
I have a divider I array'ed into 11 separate pieces. Then that array is array'ed for a second row:
getDimensions reports 11 pieces:
I would expect 22. I've attached my test file:
test-arrays.FCStd.zip
Not a very big issue! Just something I noticed.