Closed andreacarotti331 closed 1 year ago
Hi @andreacarotti331 , Would you try installing gcc-9 to match the glibc version? The exetutable is compiled using gcc 9.4.0, fyi.
Hi, it's not so simple to upgrade the gcc...usually this means the risk to break something is high. By the way I managed to workaround by following this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/61738375. I downloaded two rpm (libstdc++-11.3.1-4.3.el9.x86_64.rpm and glibc-2.34-68.el9.x86_64.rpm) and extracted by rpm2cpio in a private local folder. Now the program is running.
Maybe we can compile Uni-Dock using older glibc version to solve this problem and similar problem on CentOS with old versions. @caic99
I think it would be better if you don't prove the source code. You have two option:
Hi, got the same issue here
We have compiled Uni-Dock with glibc 2.17. unidock_glibc2_17.zip
Hi, this 2.17 build brings up more dependencies I don't have. I checked this with ldd unidock_glibc2_17
:
$ ldd unidock_glibc2_17 linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fffc491f000) libboost_system.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_thread.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_serialization.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_filesystem.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_program_options.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_chrono.so.1.77.0 => not found libboost_atomic.so.1.77.0 => not found libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f317c2bb000) libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 (0x00007f317c078000) librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f317be70000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f317bc6c000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f317b85f000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f317b4c1000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f317b2a9000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f317aeb8000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f317c4da000)
Please have a look at the missing dependencies starting with libboost*. I have 1.65 on the system but not 1.77. Are those dependencies really needed? I don't see them in the original binary build
Dear all, I'm at University of Perugia (ITLAY), I'm running an OS Rocky 8.5 that ships with gcc 2.28. When running the precompiled unidock exec I have this errors.
Could you compile it with the static option? or can you suggest me how to overcome this issue. Thanks Andrea