Marking an entry in Rules Engine with a Status of "Archived" will prevent it from being applied - which is expected.
Marking an entry in the Issue Library with a State of "Archived" does not prevent it from being applied by Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".
Expected behavior
Having a quick way to archive Issue Library entries (withing editing each #[_id]# entry) would be useful, and seems to be the best interpretation of having an Issue with a State marked "Archived".
Actual behavior
"Archived" Issue Library entry are still applied by the Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".
Thank you @mavensecurity! I'm going to go ahead and close this as this is a Pro feature and we track those in an internal idea backlog. I've already added it there! The feedback is definitely appreciated.
Steps to reproduce
Marking an entry in Rules Engine with a Status of "Archived" will prevent it from being applied - which is expected. Marking an entry in the Issue Library with a State of "Archived" does not prevent it from being applied by Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".
Expected behavior
Having a quick way to archive Issue Library entries (withing editing each #[_id]# entry) would be useful, and seems to be the best interpretation of having an Issue with a State marked "Archived".
Actual behavior
"Archived" Issue Library entry are still applied by the Rules Engine's "Match All - Find match in Library".
System configuration
Dradis version: 3.12.2
Ruby version: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-linux]
OS version: Debian 4.9.110