Open marler8997 opened 5 years ago
FYI build.d
has almost gained support for Windows.
A huge disadvantage of D is that compiling and running all D scripts might take quite some time (i.e. add overhead). Though I don't have any numbers on how fast compiling & running ~ 1000 simple D files would be.
If the overhead is reasonable low, then I think we should use D as we can easily add library sugar for things that are currently would be a bit too verbose.
After thinking about it, I think we should go with D here. rund
can mitigate performance issues along with careful usage of certain libraries in druntime/phobos (mostly phobos).
GNU Make and BASH are very difficult to get working on Windows. I wasn't able to get it working after hours of trying. It had so many issues and finding help online was almost non-existent and when there was help it didn't work.
Alternatives: