Open katrin-berkenbusch opened 3 years ago
So I have spoken to Kiarie about it and it is just the dimension of the pixels. So it might be enough to define that in the caption? I'll give it a spin:
Illustration of the spectral information split into train (40 %), validation (10 %) and test region (50 %) for the Lemon canyon. Pixel scales provided on the axis with canopy height normalised greyscale (0 - 255)
K, I’ll put that in. Should it be pixel scale on the axes though, since there are two?
On 30/06/2021, at 4:28 PM, Fabian Döweler @.***> wrote:
So I have spoken to Kiarie about it and it is just the dimension of the pixels. So it might be enough to define that in the caption? I'll give it a spin:
Illustration of the spectral information split into train (40 %), validation (10 %) and test region (50 %) for the Lemon canyon. Pixel scales provided on the axis with canopy height normalised greyscale (0 - 255)
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
They are currently missing in {fig:poc_train_data}.