Closed pabloopez closed 1 year ago
this is ready for review. It has been tested and meets the initial criteria:
The current state reuses the logic for tests, but we should merge both approaches into one (setup for track being tested, setup for track for which a sysdig saas account is provisioned).
It can be tested live here: https://play.instruqt.com/sysdig/tracks/tmp-dev-account-provisioner
And track source files are here: https://github.com/draios/instruqt/pull/517
Merging, this is working fine with the new lab.
Let's not delete the branch, as some of the new tracks are still poining to dev-account-provisioner
Ticket -> https://sysdig.atlassian.net/browse/ET-32
Problem statement:
Hands-on labs on Instruqt require to our students to have access to a Sysdig account to take the training. Most of them have access to one, but some don’t, or don’t want to use a trial or can’t use the production account of their company to complete training and learn more about the product.
Suggested approach
An alternative approach is to have a training account in which temporary users are created. These users will meet the next requirements: