Policy input:
pc = {}
ci = {loadUpperGrp, allGrp}
op1 = <null>
op2 = <null>
op3 = <null>
mem = <null>
Evaluating: ppacPol
rule match: loadUpperGrp<code=_, env=_>
Result ppacPol: Success
pc = {}
rd = {}
Evaluating: usrTypePol
rule match: loadUpperGrp<code=_, env=_>
Result usrTypePol: Success
pc = {}
rd = {}
Policy input:
pc = {}
ci = {immArithGrp, allGrp}
op1 = {}
op2 = <null>
op3 = <null>
mem = <null>
....
Better whitespace and slightly more verbosity would help:
Instruction: [address of instruction? Hex of instruction opcode?]
Policy input:
pc = {}
ci = {loadUpperGrp, allGrp}
op1 = <null>
op2 = <null>
op3 = <null>
mem = <null> [wth is mem vs op1, op2, op3?]
Evaluating: ppacPol
Rule: loadUpperGrp<code=_, env=_> [ What is the output half of the matched rule?]
Result: Success
pc = {}
rd = {}
[mem = ? other results?]
Evaluating: usrTypePol
Rule: loadUpperGrp<code=_, env=_> [ What is the output half of the matched rule?]
Result: Success
pc = {}
rd = {}
Debug output is hard to grok as is... currently:
Better whitespace and slightly more verbosity would help: