Closed drdhaval2785 closed 8 years ago
Wrong application of vaikalpika iDAgama. aniT one had 'ksa' suffix. So dhAtu should not have taken vaikalpika iDAgama in 'sic'
aklEkzIt-(kliSU!,luN,tip,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEzwAm-(kliSU!,luN,tas,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEkzuH-(kliSU!,luN,Ji,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEkzIH-(kliSU!,luN,sip,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEzwam-(kliSU!,luN,Tas,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEzwa-(kliSU!,luN,Ta,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEkzam-(kliSU!,luN,mip,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEkzva-(kliSU!,luN,vas,kryAdi,09.0058) aklEkzma-(kliSU!,luN,mas,kryAdi,09.0058)
Wrong application of vaikalpika iDAgama. aniT one had 'ksa' suffix. So dhAtu should not have taken vaikalpika iDAgama in 'sic'