search

drdhaval2785 / SanskritVerb

Verb declention for Sanskrit
41 stars 8 forks source link

pysan comparision - corrections #963

Closed drdhaval2785 closed 8 years ago

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

Here I will note the discussions going on in https://github.com/funderburkjim/elispsanskrit/issues/ where Jim is comparing the SanskritVerb and pysan generations. This is a list where I will jot down the places which require modification in SanskritVerb.

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

1 https://github.com/funderburkjim/elispsanskrit/issues/43#issuecomment-247579044 2 https://github.com/funderburkjim/elispsanskrit/issues/43#issuecomment-247594551 - AkusmAd issue for two verbs (one not in AkusmIya and one in AkusmIya).

Update - point 1 and 2 are done in #965. Nothing remains to be done now.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Jim - Regarding roots sPiwa! and sPiwwa! in verbdata:

sPiwa!:snehane ityeke:sPiw:10:0129:u:sew:स्फि॑टँ॑::1179:1267::
sPiwwa!:hiMsAyAm:sPiw:10:0056:u:sew:स्फि॑ट्टँ॑::1179:1267:sPitt1_sPittaz_curAxiH+hiMsAyAm:

Should the root without anubandha for sPiwwa! be sPiwwa ?

Dhaval - Yes. My data had 'sPiw', but should be 'sPiww'.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Jim - Why do these conjugations include the prefix 'aDi' ? Is that right?

ik:smaraRe ayamapyaDipUrvaH:i:02:0042:pa:aniw:इ॒क्:697:719:736:i3_ik_axAxiH+smaraNe:
ik pre 02.0042P:[aDyeti aDItaH aDiyanti aDyezi aDITaH aDITa aDyemi aDIvaH aDImaH]

iN pre 02.0041A:[aDIte aDIyAte aDIyate aDIze aDIyATe aDIDve aDIye aDIvahe aDImahe]
iN:aDyayane nityamaDipUrvaH:i:02:0041:A:aniw:इ॒ङ्:696:718:735:i2_if_axAxiH+aXyayane:

Dhaval - The verb meaning itself says 'aDipUrvaH'. These verbs can not have declentions without the prefix 'aDi'. Therefore, this is added.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Jim - Shouldn't gana for 'Sru' be 05 in verbdata?

Sru:SravaRe:Sru:01:1092:pa:aniw:श्रु॒:600:623:638:Sru1_Sru_BvAxiH+SravaNe:289

Dhaval - It actually is the first gaNa verb. See capture

Why it looks like 5th gaNa is because of this rule श्रुवः शृ च (3.1.74) http://sanskritdocuments.org/learning_tools/sarvanisutrani/3.1.74.htm

This rule mandates two things. 'Snu' (5th set suffix) and conversion of 'Sru'->'Sf'. Therefore the final forms look like 5th set.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Thanks for explanation of Sru. Very confusing to the non-specialist like me. I had noted that Kale, Wilson, and MadhavIya also all say class 1, in agreement with your explanation.

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

This is enough for one issue. Will start another issue for other corrections.