Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
scope is required, so a file that lacks this is invalid. As a courtesy we
"repair" the file and related is the safest. This should be documented as
optional behavior in the spec so I'll leave this open just now. But the
behavior of the parser/translator is fine.
Which input ontology were you using?
Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2011 at 5:41
The missing scope was an error of termgenie (which is now fixed).
The current 1.4 draft states that the scope for a synonym is optional:
"The value consists of a quote enclosed synonym text, an optional scope
identifier, an optional synonym type name, and an optional dbxref list"
Does this need to be changed?
Original comment by HDie...@lbl.gov
on 21 Oct 2011 at 3:30
Fixed the guide.
(note that they are optional in synonymtypedef and required in synonym. The
spec and the guide should now be consistent on this point)
Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2011 at 12:41
Original comment by HDie...@lbl.gov
on 12 Jan 2012 at 11:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
HDie...@lbl.gov
on 20 Oct 2011 at 5:02