Make a dedicated action that opens a channel. If an action goes to a remote chain and it has no channel, then the engine should be able to open a channel on behalf in the soft pulse.
This will be faster, less bottlenecking, less channels being opened a part of meta / dmz / admin actions, and focuses more on actions that have a direct impact on the state.
If the address is already resolved, should we use that same channel ? eg: if .. is root, should / be redirected to use the exact same channel as .. ?
Make a dedicated action that opens a channel. If an action goes to a remote chain and it has no channel, then the engine should be able to open a channel on behalf in the soft pulse.
This will be faster, less bottlenecking, less channels being opened a part of meta / dmz / admin actions, and focuses more on actions that have a direct impact on the state.
If the address is already resolved, should we use that same channel ? eg: if
..is root, should/be redirected to use the exact same channel as..?