Open tulku opened 9 years ago
I believe copyleft is essential. It allows the free community to prosper (as indicated in the "what is Copyleft?" GNU document), which is certainly of importance here. GPLv3 and CC BY-SA look like acceptable choices.
Now, bear in mind hardware also means patents. With what I've read, the TAPR Open Hardware Licence seems to provide better coverage against patent trolls, and I think this would be the better choice for hardware and design documents.
For the software, GPLv3 is the way to go, for the reasons mentioned before.
These are very good comments. Probably to simplify the selection process we could do it in steps:
I'm also inclined of using a copyleft license. We want to encourage more people joining the community than big companies using our code. Copyleft will give a sense of protection to the work the community does. Something without copyleft will make commercial adoption more friction less.
I would not use GPLv3 for everything. I would use LGPL for libraries and GPL for examples and complete projects. This simplifies a bit the adoption of the dreamster libraries.
For the hardware, I do want something with Copyleft and I heard good things about the TAPR license, however, it is very unknown and scares a bit. Probably CC Share Alike is a less frightening license (more well known).
It's also interesting to look at the license model Arduino uses:
Please @dreamster/comunity-council, I think this is an important issue that will be difficult to change in the future. Ask all your doubts and make all the comments you want!
@dreamster/comunity-council we need to decide which licenses we want to use:
I think this is the first decision the @dreamster/comunity-council should do!