Closed danube closed 2 weeks ago
This is an old ZLL Gamut-A light, that should be handled by the light_zll_A.json
DDF. But, by the looks of it, it's exposed through legacy code? Also, the Color Control attributes have never been read, as indicated by colorcapabilities
being zero.
I can set colorloop
on my Hue Boom, exposed by that DDF, in v2.28.1 without any issue.
951 means that the REST API plugin couldn't queue the Zigbee command, which could be because the bridge is busy, but also because of some internal error (like invalid command parameters). I think this might be caused by the value of colorcapabilities
not being available, causing the logic queueing the command to think the light doesn't support colorloop
.
Could you try and read the Color Control cluster attributes in the GUI, confirm that the API reports a non-zero colorcapabilities
and retry?
Hell yeah that worked! I figure I should do this with every single color bulb in my environment reporting 0
under colorcapabilities
?
Is this a bug? Or have I done something wrong?
I figure I should do this with every single color bulb in my environment reporting
0
undercolorcapabilities
?
Indeed.
Is this a bug?
I would expect deCONZ to read this on pairing, and persist the value to the database. If you restart deCONZ too soon after pairing, the value might not yet be persisted in the database, and it needs to be re-read after restart. I suppose that, apparently, this doesn't happen, could be considered a bug in the legacy code, but we're not going to touch that.
Or have I done something wrong?
Not sure. I'm suspicious that the light isn't exposed by DDF (which would force the re-read). It could also be that the light runs on ancient firmware (the swversion
value seems odd), that isn't supported by the DDF. You might try and update its firmware. The latest version is v67.116.3, but I haven't yet located the download location of this firmware. However, the semi-latest version linked on https://github.com/Koenkk/zigbee-OTA should cause the DDF to match.
As there has not been any response in 21 days, this issue has been automatically marked as stale. At OP: Please either close this issue or keep it active It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.
As there has not been any response in 28 days, this issue will be closed. @ OP: If this issue is solved post what fixed it for you. If it is not solved, request to get this opened again.
Does the issue really belong here?
Is there already an existing issue for this?
Describe the bug
Sending
PUT .../lights/6/state
with a payload{"effect":"colorloop"}
results inwhere
GET .../lights/6
results inI have some more color bulbs in the network. The same error occurs on each of them. So here's the API response for "Get all lights" call
GET .../lights
: https://pastebin.com/75Px7GcsI learned somewhere here, that error 951 means something like "bridge busy", but the network itself works quite fine.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
Sending
PUT .../lights/6/state
with a payload{"effect":"colorloop"}
Expected behavior
Colorloop starts
Screenshots
No response
Environment
deCONZ Logs
No response
Additional context
No response