Open SvenMartin81 opened 5 days ago
The model "_TZ3000_saiqcn0y" use the DDF _TZ3000_TS0201_temp_hum_sensor.json (use classic cluster) The model "_TZE200_9yapgbuv" use the DDF _TZE200_TS0601_humidity_temp.json (use tuya cluster)
But I have checked again it seem it use the good dpid (the 0x04)
It's strange there is no value at all, perhaps the value is still "none", can you check direclty in the API ? using Phoscon/help/API Information/sensors.
Else no other way than checking logs if the device don't use another dpid.
Hi, I am using the Beta Gateway verion 2.29.0. By looking into the DDF file you are menshen, i can't my version "_TZE200_9yapgbuv". could this be the reason?
I deleted this sensor and learnd it again to the system. but there was no change in the Battery-sensor.....it is still not availible.
By looking into the DDF file you are menshen, i can't my version "_TZE200_9yapgbuv". could this be the reason?
No I m saying you can't compare yours 2 device, they are not working same. I have see that https://github.com/zigpy/zha-device-handlers/issues/2281
This device don't use the same dpid, If I have understand It use the dpid = 3 and return 3 value for low/medium/high
Can you edit the DDF to have
{
"name": "config/battery",
"parse": {"fn": "tuya", "dpid": 3, "eval": "Item.val = Attr.val;" },
"read": {"fn": "none"},
"default": 0
},
You have it at 2 position in the DDF, then restart deconz, if it work you will have value 0 (for 25%), 1 for (50%) and 2 (for 100%) It can take time to be updated.
Hi, are you talking about this file: "_TZE200_TS0601_humidity_temp.json" in this folder: /usr/share/deCONZ/devices/tuya
if "yes": do I need to copy this file and change the file name and the dpid to 3
there is this:
"name": "config/battery",
"parse": {"fn": "tuya", "dpid": 4, "eval": "Item.val = Attr.val;" },
"read": {"fn": "none"},
"default": 0
Yes, It's exaclty that, what is your OS ? not docker ? Easier to just edit the file, change the dpid (4 > 3 ), save and restart deconz.
You can edit direclty the file, it will have an impact on all thoses devices
"manufacturername": ["_TZE200_nnrfa68v","_TZE200_znbl8dj5", "_TZE200_qoy0ekbd", "_TZE200_a8sdabtg", "_TZE200_whkgqxse","_TZE200_yjjdcqsq", "_TZE200_9yapgbuv", "_TZE200_utkemkbs", "_TZE200_locansqn", "_TZE204_yjjdcqsq"],
But the rollback is easy, and on next deconz update, the file will be reseted. It's just to test.
Else we can make a DDF just for this device, but need to create a new file and put it on another folder.
Hey,
I changed it to 3. but it is the Same as befor
Does the issue really belong here?
Is there already an existing issue for this?
Describe the bug
Hi, Phoscon is not getting the battery from this sensor: _TZE200_9yapgbuv - Product: TS0601 - Version 1.0.8
Steps to reproduce the behavior
it is always
Expected behavior
i should have the status of the battery as I have it for other sensors "_TZ3000_saiqcn0y" - Product: TS0201 - Version 1.0.6
Screenshots
Environment
deCONZ Logs
No response
Additional context
No response