search

dret / I-D

Internet Drafts I've authored or contributed to.
16 stars 13 forks source link

rewrite link relation descriptions #113

Closed dret closed 5 years ago

dret commented 5 years ago

note by @mnot (thanks!):

Just my personal .02 -

It would be great if the link relations (both in this document and the other one) were written in terms of RFC8288.

E.g. instead of: Linking to a resource providing information about a resource's or service's retirement policy and/or information. Something like: Identifies a resource that provides information about the context's retirement policy.

(We've been trying to make the use of terminology in the registry more consistent)

mnot commented 5 years ago

The important part was using terms like "context" to describe what the context of the link relation is.

dret commented 5 years ago

On 2018-11-26 22:31, Mark Nottingham wrote:

The important part was using terms like "context" to describe what the context of the link relation is.

ok, i have now mentioned the context everywhere. i hope this is more along the lines of what you were expecting.

mnot commented 5 years ago

That's better, thanks.

mnot commented 5 years ago

Are you going to resubmit?

dret commented 5 years ago

On 2018-11-27 23:51, Mark Nottingham wrote:

Are you going to resubmit?

yes, but i have two more reviews i want to go through and edit the drafts before i resubmit. should be done sometime this week.

dret commented 5 years ago

assuming the second try was good enough and closing this issue.