search

dret / webconcepts

Web Concepts: Concepts that matter for the the Web.
The Unlicense
141 stars 29 forks source link

Missing RFC 3986 - Uniform Resource Identifier #33

Open tpluscode opened 7 years ago

tpluscode commented 7 years ago

I was very surprised that the web concepts pages do not include any URI specification. I do see that there isn't a good category for that as a concept.

Maybe there should be a new category created such as Basic concepts or similar?

dret commented 7 years ago

On 2016-11-13 11:07, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote:

I was very surprised that the web concepts pages do not include any URI specification. I do see that there isn't a good category for that as a concept.

and that's the reason. unless the spec itself registers a bunch of concept values (such as RFC5988 registering link relations), the spec does not show up. i agree that this is potentially confusing, but it is logical given the setup as it is so far.

Maybe there should be a new category created such as Basic concepts or similar?

any idea how you would like these things to show up?

i have added something a tiny bit similar by all the concept pages having links to the respective IANA registries. that's not exactly what you are looking far, but is essentially how far i got.

i agree that adding these foundational specs would make sense, but i have not quite figured out how they would best appear in the context of the site as it is.

tpluscode commented 7 years ago

In all fairness it's not really about the spec but about the fundamental itself. Isn't URI a very important concept? I wonder though what other fundamentals could belong to such a category on the web concepts site

dret commented 7 years ago

On 2016-11-14 01:37, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote:

In all fairness it's not really about the spec but about the fundamental itself. Isn't URI a very important concept? I wonder though what other fundamentals could belong to such a category on the web concepts site

again, i do not object to your concerns. it simply does not fit into the current setup, and that is why it's not there.

what about this:

that's just one quick idea how address your issue. if you have other ideas, please let me know!