Closed SzMK closed 4 years ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
master@7083074
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is0%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #49 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 62.66%
=========================================
Files ? 10
Lines ? 1457
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 913
Misses ? 544
Partials ? 0
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/zinbsurf.R | 59.8% <0%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7083074...ca71fb7. Read the comment docs.
First of all, sorry for waiting so long to react to this. I'm a bit confused as to why the current code is a problem and what this PR solves. Can you please elaborate on the error that you get without adding the 0 in nleft
?
A reproducible example would be great.
A unit test would be even greater :)
Thanks! Davide
Hi, I am not sure that I can now provide a reproducible example, but I think I might explain what's the problem. Please compare lines 156-158 of zinbsurf for zeroinflation != 0:
nleft <- c(length(getEpsilon_gamma_mu(fit)),
length(getEpsilon_gamma_pi(fit)),
length(getEpsilon_W(fit)))
with lines 177-178 for zeroinflation == 0:
nleft <- c(length(getEpsilon_gamma_mu(fit)),
length(getEpsilon_W(fit)))
Later, in line 192, to get matrix corresponding to W the following is done:
newW <- t(newfit[-(seq_len(sum(nleft[1:2]))), ,drop = FALSE])
and then sum(nleft[1:2]) means different things for zeroinflation == 0 and zeroinflation != 0.
Oh, I see what you mean now, good catch!
…ewfit while creation of newW object for zeroinflation==FALSE case and rbind does not stop