Closed vincr04 closed 4 years ago
Thanks, this definitely looks like a bug, I will have a look at the data and update you here.
I can confirm that I'm able to reproduce your example. This is quite puzzling, but I'm looking into it.
I found the bug. This was due to softImpute
sometimes returning a singular value of 0. I've fixed it in version 1.11.6.
Hi, I have some 10X single-cell data and am using zinbwave to infer latent variables. I realised that when using K=2 in zinbFit, W1 values are between ~-0.2 and ~0.2, but W2 values are all 0. My code:
design <- model.matrix(~se$sex1*se$stim)
zinb <- zinbFit(Y=se, X=design, epsilon=1e6, K=2, verbose=T, BPPARAM=MulticoreParam(8))
se_zinb <- zinbwave(Y=se, X=design, epsilon=1e6, fitted_model=zinb, K=2, verbose=T, observationalWeights=T)
head(reducedDim(se_zinb))
You can download the data here: https://github.com/vincr04/variousdata/blob/master/se.Robj
Somehow if I choose K=3 the problem doesn't occur...
zinb <- zinbFit(Y=se, X=design, epsilon=1e6, K=3, verbose=T, BPPARAM=MulticoreParam(8))
se_zinb <- zinbwave(Y=se, X=design, epsilon=1e6, fitted_model=zinb, K=3, verbose=T, observationalWeights=T)
head(reducedDim(se_zinb))
Is this a bug, or did I do something wrong?