[X] I have verified that the bug I'm about to report hasn't been filed before.
What version of drizzle-orm are you using?
0.36.2
What version of drizzle-kit are you using?
0.28.1
Other packages
No response
Describe the Bug
This is possibly related to #3268, but may be a separate issue.
I have a query I'm trying to run on a Postgres database. It's fairly straightforward, but I'm getting an error thrown due to the assembled query being invalid. As an abridged and sterilized version of what I've got:
This throws an error with the following exception:
error: column Table1.field1 does not exist
It's as if it's taking the table queried and automatically applying it to any column in the where clause even though it's explicitly defined otherwise. I need this in the top where clause as I need it to be a full filter and not effectively a left join with a condition. Is this not a supported configuration or am I doing something wrong here? I would think this should work, but I don't think I've explicitly attempted this combination until recently. Aliasing the tables does not help.
Report hasn't been filed before.
What version of
drizzle-orm
are you using?0.36.2
What version of
drizzle-kit
are you using?0.28.1
Other packages
No response
Describe the Bug
This is possibly related to #3268, but may be a separate issue.
I have a query I'm trying to run on a Postgres database. It's fairly straightforward, but I'm getting an error thrown due to the assembled query being invalid. As an abridged and sterilized version of what I've got:
Pretty straightforward one-to-many relationship. I'm trying to do the following query (type = enum, field1s = string array):
This throws an error with the following exception:
It's as if it's taking the table queried and automatically applying it to any column in the where clause even though it's explicitly defined otherwise. I need this in the top where clause as I need it to be a full filter and not effectively a left join with a condition. Is this not a supported configuration or am I doing something wrong here? I would think this should work, but I don't think I've explicitly attempted this combination until recently. Aliasing the tables does not help.