Fix invalid specifier in `stone` requirement

[sagarvora]

As mentioned in https://github.com/pypa/pip-audit/issues/445#issuecomment-1363101453:

PEP 440 doesn't say it directly, but the language implies that the .* is only valid on exact comparison operators (e.g. == and !=), nor ordered comparisons (e.g. >=).

In particular, a comparison like >=3.5.* is redundant: it has the exact same meaning as >=3.5.

This is causing pip-audit to fail, like so: https://github.com/frappe/frappe/actions/runs/3811860090/jobs/6484759800#step:4:183

Checklist

General Contributing

• [x] Have you read the Code of Conduct and signed the CLA?

Is This a Code Change?

• [x] Non-code related change (markdown/git settings etc)
• [ ] SDK Code Change
• [ ] Example/Test Code Change

Validation

• [x] Does tox pass?
• [x] Do the tests pass?

[greg-db]

Thanks for sharing this! I'll ask the team to review this.

[barredterra]

I just spent an hour trying to solve this problem. But of course @sagarvora is weeks ahead 😁

[sagarvora]

@greg-db Any update?

[greg-db]

@sagarvora This is still open with the team, but I don't have an update on it yet.

[sderickson]

Hmm, the checks aren't running for this PR for some reason. Might try adding another commit just to get things going. Will pick at it also.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[sagarvora]

Hi @sderickson,

Thanks for approving the PR.

Edit: Checks are running now. Integrations tests are failing -probably because secrets are only accessible by Dropboxers.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #456 (c87d4f7) into main (9895d70) will decrease coverage by 0.58%. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.26%   63.69%   -0.58%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines       52609    52609              
  Branches     3841     3841              
==========================================
- Hits        33810    33510     -300     
- Misses      18638    19064     +426     
+ Partials      161       35     -126     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	?
unit	63.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 12 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[sagarvora]

@sderickson Can we release this please? It should fix #458 and close #464.

[sagarvora]

@sderickson The release v11.36.1 doesn't show on PyPI. Did you miss a step?

[greg-db]

@sagarvora Thanks for the note. That release has not been successfully added on PyPI. We'll follow up once we have an update.

[ghane]

Hi, could you please push this to PyPi? I am trying to install a downstream dependant, and this is making that uninstallable.

Thank you

[greg-db]

@ghane Thanks for the note! This is open with the team. I'll follow up here once that's published to PyPI.

[greg-db]

v11.36.2 is now published on PyPI.