Open levrik opened 4 years ago
Same question, I think they are working on a V2 but not sure a public release his planned. last time I read issue they said they still use that internally
I created a fork with the following changes:
And some more exciting stuff ;-)
Will be finished in the next couple of days
@hrueger that's great. Does i18n mean translations for feedback messages, custom dictionaries, both, or something else?
@hrueger Nice, but having this repo being owned (and maintained) by Dropbox instead of third parties is also what makes it attractive also. What do you think about this?
@mkopinsky
Does i18n mean translations for feedback messages, custom dictionaries, both, or something else?
both 😀 and custom keyboard layouts, too
@acamill Sure, that's a good point. I just created my fork because
CommonJS
dependencies so I needed an ES6 buildIf they want to go to TypeScript, I can create a PR
Yhea.. Problem is dropbox did not update this repo in years
we would love to use your i18n friendly fork in @forwardemail and @ladjs, please post an update here once it's released
we would love to use your i18n friendly fork in @forwardemail and @ladjs, please post an update here once it's released
https://www.npmjs.com/package/zxcvbn3 https://github.com/hrueger/zxcvbn
https://github.com/dropbox/zxcvbn/issues/290#issuecomment-688278037:
ES2015 Version published under zxcvbn3 Not completely finished yet
@niftylettuce I activated the issues module for my fork, so if you experience any problems, just create an issue there. and thanks @MuhammedZakir for the quick response.
It seems the principle developer @lowe is no longer with Dropbox (going off of LinkedIn here) and that this project is abandoned. zxcvbn is still well loved by the community but now it's time for someone else to pick up the torch.
@MatthewAry @MrWook and I are working together now. You can check the repo out here: https://github.com/MrWook/zxcvbn There's still work to be done, so contributions are welcome.
If this project is abandoned, then any alternatives?
If this project is abandoned, then any alternatives?
@MuhammedZakir I read through the conversation and know about that fork. But not tried it yet. I will try it soon.
I asked for any other alternatives that are not zxcvbn based.
@MuhammedZakir I read through the conversation and know about that fork. But not tried it yet. I will try it soon.
I asked for any other alternatives that are not zxcvbn based.
https://github.com/libpwquality/libpwquality (C & Python binding).
If you only need password validation, see https://www.passay.org/ (Java).
* I have never used either of them.
@MuhammedZakir I will check them out. And I also decided to develop my own password strength estimator with TypeScript.
Hey guys,
Like @hrueger mentioned we were in the process of rewriting this package and we finally finished and published it to npm.

Github: https://github.com/zxcvbn-ts/zxcvbn npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@zxcvbn-ts/core

This is completely rewritten in typescript even the data-script part.


The scoring changed slightly duo to following changes:

Here is a list with key changes:
@zxcvbn-ts/core
and language packages @zxcvbn-ts/language-en
. At the beginning, there is only a German and an English language package.I have some more ideas that I want to implement but first I want to increase the code and documentation quality. 
For this reason I will create issues for my ideas and move some issues from this repo to zxcvbn-ts like the concern with separators. 

If you want to contribute, discuss changed that I made or anything else feel free to check out the repo. I activated the discussion panel.

I would love to see some feedback :)
@MrWook I will test it out tomorrow. And give you my feedback. I hope it fits my needs so that I don't have to develop it again.
Hi !
Thank you for the TS version, I did open an issue at phpMyAdmin so we can switch onto it.
Could you add a message on your repos @MrWook and @hrueger and archive them if they are not currently supported ?
Hey @williamdes
My branch is only a fork of the original for a PR to add the zxcvbn-ts repo into the readme of the original even if it will never be merged.
Over a year has passed since the comment in #242. Any update here? Is it still being worked on?