search

drphilmarshall / LocalGroupHaloProps

Inferring the mass etc of the local group galaxy halos (MW, M31 and M33)
GNU General Public License v2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

Update Section 5. Conclusions #81

Open drphilmarshall opened 8 years ago

drphilmarshall commented 8 years ago

May not even need doing - it depends on the final set of tests @marxwillia was doing, on (I think) the isolation criteria, using ds14i box. @yymao are these tests critical?

yymao commented 8 years ago

@drphilmarshall Can you remind me which tests you were referring to?

drphilmarshall commented 8 years ago

I'm going purely from the paper draft, which says "Apply isolation criteria to ds14i box and compare LMC prior to the consuelo LMC prior." This seems to be the only action item listed!

yymao commented 8 years ago

Ah, ok. That's a resolution check. Not super critical but should be straightforward to do.

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:59 PM Phil Marshall notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm going purely from the paper draft, which says "Apply isolation criteria to ds14i box and compare LMC prior to the consuelo LMC prior." This seems to be the only action item listed!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/drphilmarshall/LocalGroupHaloProps/issues/81#issuecomment-218316728

drphilmarshall commented 8 years ago

Good. Let's issue it, but attach the issue to the "Submit Paper" milestone, rather than the current "Finish Paper" one. Would you mind, please?

I think this means that we can go ahead and write the conclusions, then - I'll leave this issue assigned to you, Yao, because I'd like to hear your take on what the important things we've learned are (and by "hear", I mean "read in the paper" ;-) Thanks!

drphilmarshall commented 8 years ago

@yymao I took a look at the conclusions, and tried to clean them up. Good if you can go through them and see what we are missing, and if any wording could be improved.