Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
What settings would you see as permanent?
I understand the request, as whenever you want to make an update, you have to
make the appropriate settings first.
So does this relate to "update profiles"? Or just talking about keeping last
settings persistant in config?
What settings exactly should be remembered?
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 15 Sep 2012 at 7:19
- What settings? : all the settings in this tab that are not being saved with
the cfg: "Operation..." and "Parameters..." areas
- Where? in the config .xml file, just as the of the settings in AMCu do
Original comment by vivamiloro
on 15 Sep 2012 at 9:14
The issue is that currently there is no way to save AMCU config settings for
Update Movies tab! Although you can save and load custom config settings for
AMCU - they do not contain any settings from Update Movies tab.
However, IIUC what you mean by 'Update Profiles' I think that might even be a
better solution? Example: On Update movies tab add a new button to save the
current Update Settings/Profile - independent of main AMCU Config settings?
This might also work with the option we discussed to provide some 'preset'
options for Update movies - e.g. update all ratings, update mediainfo, update
to AMC4 or some such.
Original comment by Dade...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2012 at 11:38
Yes, all this is somehow related to the "update profiles" issue.
However, in any case, we'll need the support to store the settings.
And indeed, I think to have this somehow "separate" from general config should
help to implement those update use cases.
So what we need is the specification, what settings actually have to be stored
as an update profile.
Unfortunately, we currently share the Database tab setting for both - import
and updates - so those might require separation, as otherwise, running an
update would change the import settings.
Other (probably simpler) solution is:
Use different AMCU settings files per profile - so as before, one for import -
plus adding new ones for updates, which contain stored update settings...
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 23 Sep 2012 at 2:40
I'm not sure if I understand what a 'profile' is for AMCU ;) - do you mean
Import is one 'profile' 'Update' is another?
However, I would be OK with the 'simpler' solution i.e. separate AMCU settings
files:
Example:
1. MyFilms_AMCImportSettings_[configname].xml
2. MyFilms_AMCUpdateSettings_[configname].xml
But what happens when you have Import settings loaded (as it is currently by
default) then you change to Update Movies tab - will AMCU auto load the current
Update settings for that catalog and change the name of the settings file in
top status bar display?
Still lots to consider!
Original comment by Dade...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2012 at 4:04
Indeed, there is a lot of things to consider - and we should make sure, that
changes we apply are compatible to the planned rework of AMCU.
Alternatively, we could just add what this issue is about in a first step -
saving settings on update tab (which are A LOT - be aware, that many of the
elements are ony visible, if certain stuff is selected!).
My fear is: When we save the settings - and user changes some basic functions
(e.g. update record to replace calue) - the stored items areN#t matching
properly anymore - and we have to add a lot of logic to make sure that happens!
Practically, I think the most used function of the update tab is "Update
record" - all other are probably rarely used.
So we should focus on that one.
And again - the question is, if we should save separate settings for DB fields
for update vs. import - as usually those are NOT the same!
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 24 Sep 2012 at 10:08
Yes you need to save DB fields separately for Update as that is often one of
the most imp. settings I change. I agree that first priority is Update Record.
Can we not save operations and parameters similar to Filters and restore those?
Original comment by Dade...@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2012 at 5:12
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 27 Oct 2012 at 9:52
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 3:32
I think, we should first define the exact use cases, we want to support - and
afterwards think about the best implementation.
Implementation could go different ways - handover settings when calling update,
only call a profile, that has to be create before or other approaches.
To judge, which approach fits best, we need to know in advance, what should be
supported, that is:
What parameters need to be set/defined for such an update operation, e.g. "wht
grabber" "matching option", "what field to update", "update rule", etc.
Maybe, even implementing some sort of API is even the better and more flexible
approach, as it avoids, that such profiles always have to be defined and stored
in advance...
Original comment by Guzz...@googlemail.com
on 23 Nov 2012 at 8:59
This could be used instead of the "translation table" that Guzzi said here
http://forum.team-mediaportal.com/threads/my-films-6-0-beta-released-19-10-2012-
v6-0-0-2616-mp-1-2-x-1-3-alpha.113261/page-3#post-930231
Original comment by vivamiloro
on 28 Nov 2012 at 3:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vivamiloro
on 9 Sep 2012 at 4:14