Closed joaogarin closed 6 years ago
Merging #4 into 8.x-1.x will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 8.x-1.x #4 +/- ##
====================================
Coverage 0% 0%
====================================
Files 7 7
Lines 67 67
====================================
Misses 67 67
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Plugin/GraphQL/Fields/Metatag/Value.php | 0% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
...rc/Plugin/GraphQL/Fields/Entity/EntityMetatags.php | 0% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/Plugin/GraphQL/Fields/Metatag/Key.php | 0% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b787729...a921f07. Read the comment docs.
I am really not sure about what this change would do and if it is even appropriate. But at lest would like to understand the implications and how this impacts the issue discussed in slack and in https://github.com/drupal-graphql/graphql-metatag/issues/3
Without this mark the query returns an Internal Server Error if you don't have for example bypass field security enabled (which no-one should I guess in normal roles or anonymous)