Open drusepth opened 11 years ago
In thinking through it, I think the best course of action from both the user putting content up for adoption and the user adopting it would be this:
Perhaps it'd be worth allowing people putting content up to specify what kind of post-adoption form would be required ("what are you going to do with this character?" etc), if any. I'm not sure whether that'd be a good idea or not, or whether requiring anything to slow down adoption is even worth it at all. What do you think?
The general situation I have in mind is writers commissioning characters to others, so there would most likely be an exchange of money involved. This is sort of related to an idea I had for an art website that would facilitate commissions but that's another discussion. Do we want to facilitate an exchange of money, even if it is just via PayPal or something?
To extend your list, here's the idea of workflow I have.
I've had the idea for an art website with facilitated commissions rattling around in my head for a while, I would absolutely love it if I could build that site and we built a lot of interop between them. Or if we built that functionality into this and upgrade Indent into an all-around intellectual property engine :dollar:
Good ideas. I'd definitely love to support person-to-person money transfers as well. The varying levels of button / textbox / form / price is a solid way to support each of the various adoption use-cases in a simple way; I like it.
Would there ever be a messaging system on the website?
Eventually, yes. I think it's inevitable as social features get added that some way of on-site communication accompanies them. I actually have a milestone for Inbox-based messaging, but no issues in it: https://github.com/drusepth/Indent/issues?milestone=47&state=open. It might be the right time to fill it up with some issues if you want to pursue implementing adoption next.
Should content always have an "original owner"/"creator" field?
I think yes. I also think it wouldn't be hard to include a migration whenever adoption is tackled that creates a creator field and copies over the owner field values as a default. I completely agree that giving attribution to the original creator is a great idea.
Would definitely love to expand Indent into an all-around intellectual property engine, and it seems like art would be a natural expansion to writing. Supporting commissions for covers and artwork seems like a great way to support writing as well. There's also an empty milestone for an "Illustration Marketplace" (https://github.com/drusepth/Indent/issues?milestone=41&state=open), which, if that feels like it suits your idea, you're more than welcome to fill with issues fleshing our that idea rattling around your head. :)
I'm not too sure about this. How would a content end up without an owner? That content still has a creator, even if they aren't on the website anymore, and I'm wondering how that content would be treated as intellectual property. It could be argued that since the original creator left the website, they relinquished the rights to it, but I think it would be better if content transferred between users only with the owner's permission. Otherwise I think it would be best to just delete any orphaned content.